
Evolves from Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal
Scarlet & Violet
•
Pokémon
•
Psychic
•
Stage 1




Parole Evidence • 20×
(a) Evidence admitted pending a ruling on admissibility becomes admissible. (b) The oral warranty and the document should be interpreted together and harmoniously, if possible. (c) If no contradiction arises, the principle in Hawrish does not apply. (d) If there is a contradiction, (Hawrish:) there is a strong presumption for the written document, but the oral warranty can prevail if clearly intended to do so.
Weakness:
×2

Resistance:
None
Retreat cost:



NO. 125 (1984). 9 DLR (4th) 496 (BCCA)
illus. Lambert JA
#125/189
Created by @RotomMower on 26 February 2025